|
The parchments of
the Rennes-Le-Chateau affair
|
 The small parchment :
It is surprising because I never believed indeed in the small parchment that Bérenger Saunière would have discovered during its excavations or rather works that he had achieved. It is true that this document as well as a second fell in the actuality like a hair on soup with the release of the book of Gérard De Sède" The treasure Curses Rennes-Le-Chateau ".
The bothersome point is that many authors based the survey of their works on these simple documents. For Gérard of Sède these documents have been presented him of sure source, without hollowing that him of it precise the origin, as being the original documents on which Bérenger Saunière had worked.
Thereafter Pierre Plantard De Saint Claire will pretend that they were completely false and of recent invoice. Some even pretended that they had been written by the famous Francis Blanche at the time of one epic evening. Plantard came back on its affirmation while pretending that they had been achieved by Philippe of Chérisey, but that he would have been inspired by original documents.
Let's think a little! Let's leave from the principle that these documents, and especially the small parchment, are forgeries having been achieved solely to deceive Gérard De Sède since he is the first to have spoken to of it and of it to have made know the existence. It is necessary really to have anything else to make to have fun achieving such a document. Or one wants to make the poisoning absolutely around this business or one wishes to direct it toward a very determined goal. This hypothesis is not maybe to disregard indeed.
On what does this history of parchment rest? It rests on the testimony of two people that returned that Bérenger Saunière, during the works of the altar, would have found in two rollers of wood seals, them even hidden inside the Wisigoth pillar of the altar, these famous parchments. But has, a second testimony informs us that, always during the works of repairing of the church, bellringer Captier would have noticed a vial of glass fallen of an old baluster, that one can always see to the museum of Earth of Rhédae, and in which would have been the famous parchments.
Therefore the question first that it is necessary to land: WERE THE PARCHMENTS IN THE PILLAR WISIGOTH OR IN THE BALUSTER?
Already dice the beginning we leave on an uncertainty. The only thing that it really takes of it out again is that Bérenger Saunière certainly found something.
Let's think a little and let's be logical! It is likely that Bérenger Saunière is found of the rollers of wood sealed in the pillar. Why? Merely because him to recover it of the documents or relics in relation with the consecration of the Saint-Marie-Madeleine church.
It remains therefore the baluster. It is what seems the most logical. But in this case the documents or all other are they the same that those that one presents in the different works of our time? And well I don't think it! I think that the documents that Bérenger Saunière found were is destroyed by his care is again has them he handed to a third or his religious superior.
On the other hand, it is likely that these documents have been written maybe by Bérenger Saunière himself or to his instigation!
Why it? and let's study the small parchment well and let's see what makes me opt for this hypothesis : :
It is that " M " who gives me this idea
Indeed that is the same calligraphy that the one used on the plate patronymique of the Magdala tower. And then it is necessary to be objective, it is obvious that the syntax of the hidden sentence doesn't absolutely have anything of Wisigoth or old French!
It is therefore obvious that these documents are of modern invoice. What is the implication of this theory? It imposes two types of reasoning: Or these documents have been written a few years ago by people needing to make live a theory, and in that case the need must be imperious to disorientate the potential researchers or these documents have cannot be written that by Bérenger Saunière that wanted to warn the gravity of the topic.
Now study this sentence :
A DAGOBERT I I ET A SION EST CE TRESOR ET IL EST LA MORT !!!
It seems clear. Numerous people spoke to us of the supposed Priory of Sion on the occasion of reading and the interpretation of this sentence.
But maybe it is not necessary to look for non-existent problems the SION word he would not designate merely Jerusalem? Henri Lincoln proposes the same hypothesis.
Therefore if we leave from this hypothesis it is therefore logical to say that this secret or treasure as it is clearly named would be descended of Jerusalem.
But this is for as much the treasure of Jerusalem ?
On the other hand the author of this document also specifies us that this secret is also the property of DAGOBERT II last king of the Mérovingienses. Dagobert II was after the death of his/her/its father Sigebert III in 656 messenger in an Irish monastery by the mayor of the Grimoald palace, son of Seed of Landen, that wanted to make king his own son Childebert. Carried to the throne in 676 by the Austrasienses, after the death of their king Childeric. Dagobert II was murdered in drill of Woëvre forest to Stenay in 679. It is this same Dagobert that was canonized under the name of Saint Dagobert.Therefore the secret would belong to this king and Jerusalem. But what the tie is between this historic city and this king Mérovingien?The Mérovingienses had the particularity to be a king by blood and were recognized of God, this according to the narrations even of the church. But what could be the innate privilege of this dynasty?
Some authors didn't hesitate to pretend that they were Jesus' descendants. It is true that to make genealogy is not easy thing but to make some on a dynasty going back up so far the is even less. Must one take then nearly in account this hypothesis unverifiable? I don't dare to be pronounced.
|
--------
-
